Frustrated Bar Examinee

Archive for May, 2007

Nationwide MBE scores

Posted by FBE on May 24, 2007

Along with the release of the February 2007 Pennsylvania bar results came the release of nationwide MBE scores.

According to this, the national mean MBE scaled score was 136.88. The national range of MBE scaled score runs from 70.9 to 183.4. 70.9!!!! Now I don’t feel quite so bad about my 119 in February (although I wish I would’ve kept my 129 from July 2006 since I would’ve passed). I feel sorry for the person who scored a 70.9, especially if he/she finds out that he/she has the worst MBE score in the entire country. And how does someone attain a 183.4 score? Dude must have done some serious studying.

I wonder if anyone has ever gotten a perfect score on the MBE? And if that ever happened, what would the scaled score be?

Posted in Bar prep, exam & results, MBE | 4 Comments »

Creating my own MBE outlines

Posted by FBE on May 22, 2007

I read on a few bar blogs that I should make my own condensed MBE outlines of 10-15 pages, so I’ve been doing that.

I just finished my Evidence outline, although it needs some streamlining. I am using the NCBE’s MBE outlines to create my own outlines, which I’m fleshing out using BarBri’s outlines. It’s been tough going because BarBri’s outline layout is so radically different from NCBE’s that I have to keep going back and forth to find the information I need to plug into NCBE’s outline. Why doesn’t BarBri just follow NCBE’s format instead of putting certain topics in completely different sections?

I’m still sloughing my way through Walton’s Strategics and Tactics for the MBE. Legis commented that the print was really hard to read. Legis is right, it’s really hard to focus on reading because I have to struggle to follow along with the tiny print. I wish they would have made the font bigger and easier to read. I finished the main section but I haven’t started on the sections for each MBE subject. I wanted to try and read a section every night but I did nothing last night. I’ll read the Evidence section tonight.

Posted in Bar prep, exam & results, MBE | Leave a Comment »

MBE strategy books

Posted by FBE on May 18, 2007

I received the “Mastering the MBE” book by John J. Talamano in the mail last weekend, and I just finished it yesterday. Although I thought the first couple of chapters were a little condescending, once the author gets into the meat of the MBE he actually offers a lot of helpful information. It’s not a very in-depth analysis of the MBE but it’s a good starter book. Talamano offers several strategies for encountering MBE questions, some of which I found to be helpful, but there were a couple of strategies that I thought were extreme. For instance, Talamano recommends turning each MBE question into an essay by writing it out. He also talks about skipping questions and to plan ahead of time which questions to skip. That seems to be setting yourself up for failure. I’d rather guess at a question and have a 25% chance of getting it right than skipping it completely. I need every point I can get! I guess if you’re running out of time it would be useful, but not for me.

I ended up marking several pages for future reference, and I also typed some notes out of the book. I would recommend this book to anyone as a warm-up to studying for the MBE.

I received my “Strategies & Tactics for the MBE” book by Kimm Walton and Steve Emanuel in the mail the other day so I just started reading that book. At first I was overwhelmed by the thickness of the book but after skimming the pages I realized that most of the pages are devoted to the over 500 MBE practice questions. The book also has sections devoted to each MBE subject which appeals to me.

I also started doing MBE practice questions this week and typing out the answer explanations. I know I said I was going to write them down on a legal pad, but I’ve always studied by typing all through law school. I’ve been using MBE software for my practice questions so it’s easier to type the explanations in Word than to drag out a legal pad and write it out.

Posted in Bar prep, exam & results, MBE | 6 Comments »

I’m officially screwed

Posted by FBE on May 16, 2007

I finally forced myself to go get the application update form and other forms notarized, and just dropped the envelope in the mailbox along with the $575 check. I had to restrain myself from sticking my arm into the mailbox and fishing the envelope out in a fit of panic.

Well, it’s now official: I’m taking the Colorado bar exam again. Why do I have the urge to vomit in my mouth every time I read that last sentence?

Posted in Bar prep, exam & results | Leave a Comment »

Law school loan repayments

Posted by FBE on May 16, 2007

I know this is everyone’s favorite topic so I won’t beat around the bush. Government loans were a breeze to consolidate, and I’ve also been able to “consolidate” my private loans and lower my interest rate to 5.99%. Here’s how I did it.

I consolidated my federal law school loans while in law school and locked in a low interest rate of 3.25%. I also set up direct debit so I would get the 0.25% discount on my interest rate, bringing my interest down to 3%. Even better, direct debit guarantees that repayments are made on time so after I’ve made 36 consecutive scheduled payments on time, another interest discount of 1% applies which will bring my interest down to 2%. It’s kind of nice to have direct debit set up and then forget about those repayments, especially since the payment amounts are only around $250 a month for me under the Income Contingent repayment plan.

Private loans are another story, however. I took out 3 private loans from Access Group over the course of law school. I came to law school with absolutely no money so I had to borrow money for all my expenses. I never borrowed the full amount of attendance costs at my law school, but I borrowed enough to get by. As frugal as I tried to be during law school, I still ended up with a sizable amount of debt. When I received my Access Group repayment statements after law school graduation, I was staggered by how high my interest rates were on those 3 private loans. It actually brought me to tears. I knew they had raised the interest rates, but to almost 12%??? Adding insult to injury, I could not find any loan providers that would consolidate my private loans. When I calculated how much I would pay in interest every year on the Access loans, I was shocked to discover that it would be in the neighborhood of approximately $2,000 a year. I tried to make large payments to Access each month, but it seemed like I was always paying off interest without being able to touch the principal. I felt like Access Group and other private lenders had it set up so that people would never be able to pay off their loans.

Fortunately my husband was sympathetic to my plight (especially since it affects him financially too!), so he researched personal loans and found one that would pay off my private loans and lower my interest to 8.9% (and on only one big loan instead of 3 separate loans too!). I was nervous about using personal loans because I hoped to find an employment position with a loan repayment assistance program (LRAP). However I learned that even if I secured employment with LRAP benefits, they would only make payments on the government loans, not the private loans. So we took out the personal loan from Capital One, and I can’t tell you how good it felt to pay my private loans in full and bid Access Group and its exorbitant interest rates sayonara!

A month or so later, we learned that our federal credit union was offering balance transfers at 5.99% interest. We were all over this offer!!! I transferred my balance from the Capital One loan to our federal credit union, and the interest rate on my private loans is now 5.99%, half what it was with Access Group! Even better, we now have a fixed payment schedule that ensures that my private loans will be paid off within 5 years. I feel SO much better and more positive now that I’ve gotten my private loans away from the evil grip of Access Group and can see the light at the end of the tunnel. Once the private loans are paid off, we’ll be able to increase the payments on my government loans to pay those off more quickly. I’m hoping we’ll have all my law school loans completely paid off within 10 years.

If you have private loans with high interest rates you may want to consider the strategy we used. There are so many banks and financial institutions out there offering personal loans at much lower rates than law school loan providers that it would be worth a look. If you happen to be a member of a credit union, even better. It’s also worth setting up direct debit on your government loans to cut up to 1.5% off your current interest rate. 1.5% doesn’t sound like much but it goes a long way if you have $50,000.00 in government loans, of which 1.5% is $750.

I’ll get off my soapbox now. Sorry to preach but I am notoriously cheap and have been known to argue with the cashier over 50 cents, so obviously I had a big problem with throwing away $2,000 a year in interest for nothing. I’m also lucky to have a husband who is very financially smart and responsible! Thanks Sarge!

Posted in Uncategorized | 2 Comments »

AdaptiBar

Posted by FBE on May 14, 2007

I’ve been reading and hearing about AdaptiBar, and one commenter just mentioned it, so I finally took a serious look at their website. AdaptiBar is apparently an internet-based MBE prep program using only ACTUAL MBE questions released by the NCBE, not simulated questions like BarBri’s and PMBR’s. They go further than MicroMash in that they break down your strengths and weaknesses not only by MBE subject, but also by the subtopics such as Negligence, Intentional Torts, et cetera. They even have explanations for the answers, something the released MBEs are lacking since they only have the answer keys. I think that’s pretty great.

Plus the course is $295, but they’re currently offering a $50 discount so that would bring the total cost to $245. Way cheaper than BarBri’s and PMBR’s 3-day MBE workshop. I think I should probably at least invest in something to help me with the MBE, plus it’d be great to use the computer to practice actual MBE questions instead of my printouts.

Posted in Bar prep, exam & results, MBE | 9 Comments »

Released MBEs

Posted by FBE on May 14, 2007

As you probably know, NCBE has 3 released MBEs available for purchase, as well as the 2006 MBE Annotated Preview (online practice exam with 100 questions from recent MBEs).

I was able to get my paws on the July 1997 MBE as well as the 1992 MBE (over 500 questions). I also have the 2006 questions which I copied from the online practice exam. My subscription expired with the February 2007 bar exam so I’d have to purchase another $26 subscription. I’m not sure if I’ll do that since I already have the questions and explanations, but the practice is very helpful especially at work.

Updated 5/19/2008 – there was a link from which you could download the 1992 and 1997 MBEs, but I’ve been notified that the link is now defunct.  So shoot me an e-mail and I’ll forward them to you.

Does anyone else know of any other released MBEs other than the 1991, 1992, 1997, 1998, and 2006 ones?

Posted in Bar prep, exam & results, MBE | 3 Comments »

How to write MPT memos

Posted by FBE on May 14, 2007

I came across this helpful advice on how to format your MPT memos, provided by BarWriteBlog. Even though my problem is the MBE, I don’t plan to neglect my essay and MPT studying. I’d shoot myself if I got a great score on the MBE next time but a crappy score on the essay/MPT, and failed AGAIN.

How to Format Legal Memos on the MPT for Higher Bar Exam Scores:

MEMORANDUM

To: Bar Candidates

From: Mary Campbell Gallagher, J.D., Ph.D., President,
BarWrite® and BarWrite Press

Re: How to Format a Legal Memorandum on the MPT (Revised 4/2/07)

Date: April 2, 2007

INTRODUCTION

The Multistate Performance Test (MPT) allows bar candidates an extremely short time in which to research and write a legal memorandum, only 90 minutes. This memorandum will help you to use correct memo format, organize your memo, write powerful topic headings, finish on time, and earn a high score. We do not deal here with other important aspects of your legal memorandum on the MPT, including persuasive writing, argument from supportive law, distinction of or attack against unfavorable law, and skillful use of the facts. To do your best persuasive writing on the MPT, we recommend using the BarWrite® systems that are taught in the book and CDs Scoring High on Bar Exam Essays, the Under-Here-Therefore(TM) systems for the paragraph, for outlining, and for legal analysis.

DISCUSSION

To score high on a legal memorandum on the MPT, use the memo format the MPT asks for.

Using the memorandum format correctly is key on the MPT. The MPT point sheets indicate that the graders award points for the following:

(a) powerful topic headings,
(b) persuasive writing,
(c) argument from supportive law,
(d) distinction of–or attack against–unfavorable law,
(e) skillful use of the facts, and
(f) careful use of the memo format.

Note that the bar candidate is being graded on “careful use of the memo format.”

In your Legal Writing course, you probably learned a format for the legal memorandum something like this:

(A.) Heading;
(B.) Issue(s);
(C.) Brief Answer;
(D.) Facts;
(E.) Discussion; and
(F.) Conclusion.

The MPT, by contrast, usually asks the candidate to use the following radically simplified format:

(A.) Heading
(B.) Introduction;
(C.) Discussion;
(D.) Conclusion.

The format on the MPT is so abbreviated that your knowledge of correct format will stand out. While these are the usual four parts of the legal memorandum on the MPT, incidentally, nothing requires MPT tasks to have identical formats. Read the directions in the supervising attorney’s memo with care.

Usually, however, there is no section in the memo for a Statement of Facts, no section for Issues, no section for Brief Answers. The memo on the MPT is short, short, short. It contains just a Heading and Introduction, a Discussion, and a Conclusion. We treat the Discussion in the next section and then return to the Heading, Introduction and Conclusion.

The supervising attorney memorandum will help you structure the central segment of your memorandum, called the Discussion, and divide it into sections.

One function of the MPT supervising attorney memo is always to help you to structure your work product. That holds true where the MPT task is to write a legal memorandum. In the MPT case called In re Steven Wallace, for example, the supervising attorney memo asks the bar candidate to write a two-part legal memorandum. That is, the Discussion section of the memo will have two main parts.

The supervising attorney memo specifies that in the first part of the Discussion the bar candidate will explain the legal and factual bases for the trustee in bankruptcy’s position that the client’s painting is part of a gallery owner’s estate in bankruptcy. In the second part, the bar candidate will examine in turn each of the statutory exceptions to the state bankruptcy law, seeking to put together a factual argument that the client’s painting is not part of the estate in bankruptcy.

When the supervising attorney memo tells you to do two things in your memo, you should divide your Discussion into those two main parts.

Powerful topic headings are a key part of the Discussion section of your legal memorandum.

After you have written each section of your Discussion, give it a powerful topic heading. Underline every topic heading. For example:

Under FCC sec. 2-326(3), Charles Client’s strongest argument in support of arbitration is that the contract he entered into with Bee Brokerage required “alternative dispute resolution.”

The topic headings guide the reader through the argument of the memorandum. They are signposts to your argument.

In writing your legal memorandum on the MPT, leave the first page and the last page blank, write the whole Discussion, and then go back and fill in the Heading and the Introduction on the first page and add the Conclusion at the end.

Leave the first page of your blue book blank. The last things you will write in your blue book are (i) the Heading and the Introduction for the MPT memorandum, at the beginning of the memo, and (ii) the Conclusion at the end.

In the order of writing the legal memorandum, again, you should leave the first page of the bluebook blank. If you have left the first page of the bluebook blank, then after writing the Discussion, that is, the body of the memo, you can go back to the first page of the bluebook and write the Heading for the memo and the Introduction.

Here is how to do the Heading for your memorandum. Almost at the top of the first page you should put in all capital letters, centered, printed, and underlined: MEMORANDUM.

Flush with the lefthand margin you will list the recipient’s name, the writer’s name, the subject, and the date:

To: Pat Partner

From: Candidate

Re: Charles Client – Arbitration of Securities Claims

Date: April 2, 2007

Only after you have finished your Discussion, that is, will you write your Introduction. The Introduction to your memorandum will say what the partner memo asked you to do, and it will report that you have done it.

Finally, when the Heading, the Introduction, and the Discussion are finished, you will add the Conclusion at the end. The Conclusion will restate what the partner memo asked you to do and state that you have done it. It will restate your conclusion and argument in one or two sentences.

CONCLUSION

A bar candidate can produce an MPT memorandum that will maximize his or her score by using the correct memo format, hitting the main points in the assignment, and managing time. Again, the bar examiners say that they are looking for:

(a) powerful topic headings,
(b) persuasive writing,
(c) argument from supportive law,
(d) distinction of–or attack against–unfavorable law,
(e) skillful use of the facts, and
(f) careful use of the memo format.

Follow the directions in the partner memo, hit the main points, manage your time, combine attention to these aspects of your work with careful attention to the BarWrite® systems for persuasive writing, and you can get a high score on a legal memorandum on the MPT.

Posted in Bar prep, exam & results, MPT | Leave a Comment »

MBE outlines by NCBE

Posted by FBE on May 13, 2007

The NCBE has outlines of what will be tested in each MBE subject on their website, and even tells you what specific areas will be tested more or less frequently on the MBE. Very helpful! I’m copying them onto Word documents and I’ll definitely be using these outlines to help me study. Here are the NCBE links to the outlines:

Constitutional Law

Contracts

Criminal Law and Procedure

Evidence

Property

Torts

Posted in Bar prep, exam & results, MBE | Leave a Comment »

Blah

Posted by FBE on May 11, 2007

I just had a meeting with one of my big bosses, and he said he was sorry to hear about the bar. I guess my direct supervisor told him, although I never told anyone at work that I failed the bar again. I just said “thanks” and didn’t say anything else. I think he was probably waiting for me to say more, but I didn’t. I don’t want to talk about it at work. It’s bad enough that they know I failed twice.

Now that I’m taking it for the third time, I’m not breathing a word to anyone here becauseI don’t want them to know I’m taking it again. I’m nervous about what their reaction will be when I tell them I’m ending my one-year position 2 weeks earlier than planned. My replacement is starting in mid-August which I find surprising because they were pretty adamant about me starting work the week after the July 2006 bar exam. It seems like they’re expecting me to stay well into early August if the replacement is starting so late. Oh well, not my problem.

Posted in Failing the bar | Leave a Comment »